Poster Presentation International Solvent Extraction Conference 2025

Influence of Alkane Diluents on Uranium(IV) and Plutonium(IV) LOC in TBP 30% (122639)

Anne Lelias 1 , Justine Cambe Issaadi 1 , Frédéric Fargier 1 , Donation Gomes Rodrigues 1 , Bénédicte Arab-Chapelet 1 , Ana Gil-Martin 2 , Frédéric Lepretre 3 , Florian Mèze 4
  1. Process Research Department for Mine and Fuel Recycling, Montpellier University, Bagnols/Cèze
  2. Orano Recycling, Orano, Châtillon, France
  3. Orano Recycling, ORANO, La Hague, France
  4. Orano Projects, ORANO, Monyigny le Bretonneux, France

The PUREX process currently implemented at the La Hague reprocessing plant allows the quantitative recovery of uranium and plutonium after their liquid-liquid extraction by the solvent composed of tributylphosphate (TBP) diluted at 30% in hydrogenated tetrapopylene (TPH). Despite its high efficiency versus the spent nuclear fuel reprocessing, the TBP-TPH mixture can split in one extractant-rich and a second diluent-rich phases, when the limiting organic concentration of uranium(IV) and/ or plutonium(IV) is reached[1]. In addition to the chemical process complications caused by this phase transition, determination of the limiting plutonium organic concentration is also a concern for nuclear safety reasons.

Because the diluent is known to have a significant impact on the third phase formation [2], several industrial scale production C10-C13 isoparaffinic, TPH analogues, were selected and their influence on this deleterious phenomenon apparition was investigated.

Extractions of plutonium(IV) and uranium(IV) from nitric acid medium by TBP diluted at 30% in different diluents (n-dodecane, TPH and 3 types of C10-C13 isoparaffines) was carried out. Due to the challenge in separating and analyzing the extractant–rich as the diluent-rich solutions, and limiting organic concentration (LOC) of uranium(IV) and plutonium(IV) were determined.

After deliberately inducing the organic phase splitting, two methods were tested to manage the critical point of third phase disappearance.

The first approach consisted to increase the temperature of the contacted phases from 25 to 35°C, while the second corresponds to an innovative way of investigation. On the contrary to the usual method that adds fresh solvent, micro-addition of nitric acid at the same concentration as the actinide solution (10µl each) are performed at 25°C until reaching only 2 phases. When decreasing the experiment temperature to 24°C, limit of the organic concentration is confirmed if the third phase reappeared. LOC as distribution ratio of U(IV) as Pu(IV) were determined after analyzing the only two reappeared phases.

It is noteworthy to mention that an appropriate liquid-liquid extraction methodology was performed to obtain a pure uranium(IV) aqueous solution in order to measure U(IV) LOC.

While the different diluents have a close composition, third phase formation strongly depends on the nature of the diluent. In addition to new results obtained on these diluents, this study also confirms the higher loading capacity for TBP/TPH compared to TBP/n-dodecane[3].

  1. Horner, D.E. Formation of third phases and the effect of temperature on the distribution of plutonium and uranium in extractions by tri-n-butyl phosphate, 1971, Report ORNL 4724
  2. Kolarik, Z. The Formation of a Third Phase in the Extraction of Pu(IV), U (IV) and Th(IV) Nitrates with Tributyl Phosphate in Alkane Diluents. in International Solvent Extraction Conference. 1977. Toronto, Canada.
  3. Plaue, J., Gelis A., and Czerwinski K., Plutonium Third Phase Formation in the 30% TBP/Nitric Acid/Hydrogenated Polypropylene Tetramer System. Solvent Extr. Ion Exch., 2006. 24(3): p. 271-282.
  • Abstract category selection: